Posts

Being a plagiariser or a dropout and Lipstick and big hair styles and holding a foreign passport are no Defence to the callousness and Hurt. It is premeditated murder if by any deliberate act or omission, that someone will end up dead. Do you intend that someone will end up dead? There is a man from a country that is suffering racial profiling and racialism in the medical profession and he cannot get a job or payments from his clients. A Woman calls them and says so long as they don't pay, she will own it and she will cancel the payments. But, she cannot own it. Essentially, she is conspiring to kill him. She cannot own it if he is dead. He could sell it when he is alive. He asks you for assistance and under the EU code you are obligated to provide the assistance as soon as the request or application for help is made. You want to know why this is. It is stipulated in Article 13(1l of the directive. The French are beautiful people. The policy is applied correctly in Belgium. If you opt not to provide actual housing or food immediately at the time of the application, you need to provide sufficient cash benefit or other such finance resources so that the individual can procure his own housing or shelter and other necessities such as food. You can also refer them to the national services for housing and assistance. You should not be waiting for a French judgement involving a French situation involving EU policy being misapplied when it is certainly clearly EU policy and EU law and you already have an EU Belgian judgement on the scenario of "when" Benefits are applied. They are applied and provided at the time the application is made. Maybe you are a bank robber that started robbing the bank in Quebec after your husband saw "it" rise up one night after you drank some Viagra in a milk shake he gave you in 1998 in North Montreal. Then you went to France to start a rebellion after you failed to appear in Court in Quebec City and you worked as a social worker near a bus stop named Leningrad. So, you are rising up! What ever you are, you do not have the right to kill anyone with a dereliction of duty; not even yourself. You should not be waiting for a French judgement involving a French situation with EU policy being misapplied when it is certainly EU policy and law and you already have an EU judgement on the scenario. To rectify the problem, you could activate the Vitals card the refugees or Asylum seekers receive. Otherwise, you face Criminal liability under the penal code. Charges could include Attempt murder for every person who sought help and help was not provided under your supervision and obligated duty. ASYLUM/Refugee POLICY is not unlike airline policy as it deals with the Safety of the individual, many individuals and you cannot have people interrupting and doing what they want as it risks lives. It could never happen in the airline industry. We deny ourselves and our opinion in submission to the policies, law and guidelines established for the safety and preservation of lives. This is much the same with refugee/asylum seekers. This is the attitude you need to have. Read the following: Case C-79/13 Saciri and others (Arbeidshof te Brussel, Belgium, reference for a preliminary ruling on Articles 13 and 14 of the Reception Conditions Directive, 27 February 2014) Judgment // AG Opinion // Application 1. Article 13(5) of Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers must be interpreted as meaning All material reception conditions under this regulation must be provided from the time of the application according to Article 13(1) and 13(2) accordingly and where a Member State has opted to grant the material reception conditions in the form of financial allowances or vouchers, that those allowances must be provided from the time the application for asylum is made, in accordance with the provisions of Article 13(1) of that directive that requires all reception requirements be met at the time of the application and must meet the minimum standards set out in Article 13(2) thereof. All material reception conditions under this regulation must be provided from the time of the application according to Article 13(1) and 13(2) accordingly. That Member State must ensure that the total amount of the financial allowances covering the material reception conditions is sufficient to ensure a dignified standard of living and adequate for the health of applicants and capable of ensuring their subsistence, enabling them in particular to find housing(hotel, motel, hostel as they have no proof of income for standard rentals) having regard, if necessary, to the preservation of the interests of persons having specific needs, pursuant to Article 17 of that directive. The material reception conditions laid down in Article 14(1), (3), (5) and (8) of Directive 2003/9 do not apply to the Member States where they have opted to grant those conditions in the form of financial allowances only. Nevertheless, the amount of those allowances must be sufficient to enable minor children to be housed with their parents, so that the family unity of the asylum seekers may be maintained. 2. Directive 2003/9 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude, where the accommodation facilities specifically for asylum seekers are overloaded, the Member States from referring the asylum seekers to bodies within the general public assistance system, provided that that system ensures that the minimum standards laid down in that directive as regards the asylum seekers are met. The failure to use all the available state resources to save the life of the individual who is in need of help as certified is also a Criminal offence once notified. See.... CHAPTER III OF THE FRENCH CRIMINAL CODE. ENDANGERING OTHER PERSONS Articles 223-1 to 223-20 SECTION I RISKS CAUSED TO OTHER PERSONS Articles 223-1 to 223-2 ARTICLE 223-1 (Ordinance No. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September into force 1 January 2002) The direct exposure of another person to an immediate risk of death or injury likely to cause mutilation or permanent disability by the manifestly deliberate violation of a specific obligation of safety or prudence imposed by any statute or regulation is punished by one year's imprisonment and a fine of €15,000. ARTICLE 223-2 Legal persons may incur criminal liability pursuant to the conditions set out under article 121-2, for the offence defined under article 223-1. The penalties incurred by legal persons are: 1° a fine, pursuant to the conditions set out under article 131-38; 2° the penalties enumerated under 2°, 3°, 8° and 9° of article 131-39. The prohibition mentioned under 2° of article 131-39 applies to the activity in the exercise of which or on the occasion of the exercise of which the offence was committed. ------- OBSTRUCTING MEASURES OF ASSISTANCE AND OMISSION TO HELP Articles 223-5 to 223-7-1 ARTICLE 223-5 (Ordinance No. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September into force 1 January 2002) Wilfully obstructing the arrival of help intended save a person from an imminent peril or to combat a disaster which endangers the safety of persons is punished by seven years' imprisonment and a fine of €100,000. ARTICLE 223-6 (Ordinance No. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September into force 1 January 2002) Anyone who, being able to prevent by immediate action a felony or a misdemeanour against the bodily integrity of a person, without risk to himself or to third parties, wilfully abstains from doing so, is punished by five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000. The same penalties apply to anyone who wilfully fails to offer assistance to a person in danger which he could himself provide without risk to himself or to third parties, or by initiating rescue operations.

I am an INORI ™ designer and I will be low key like the mobile phone designer. This is my Contribution ™- Angel Ronan Lex Scripta ™. A new concept called "Safe Sleepers ™"; A novel kind of Hostel is emerging that is essentially a giant open space coffee shop with fountain juice, tea, coffee, gravy and fries or crisps, bread and cheese served 24 hours per day on the ground floor. Did you know the average baby is 7 pounds at five months of gestation? Keeping the baby in the womb for longer is not ancient wisdom. So, now we ask what is the evidence in the hotel industry? The evidence is that the building is 90% vacant. So, vacancy says there is no revenue as intended if it's vacant. It's vacant at $100.00 a night so we ask what happens if we set the price at $40.00 a night. We see that the building is not as vacant. In fact, there are more bookings. There really are more bookings. It could not be that the industry runs in an extortion principle. More bookings means there is more money. There is a Mercure and an Ibis Budget side by side and they are both empty for the same ownership company. But, they are less empty now at $40.00 per night. We could use a supply and demand chart. We see that at the current rate, there are maybe 4 guests per night. At $40.00 per night, the number of guests increases to about 70 a night in the immediate change of Rate since the competition may continue to argue with the revenue observations made here. The other factor is location and Maybe there is a hotel guest that might choose to spend time at a hotel more often yet otherwise, he will stay Home. But, if the average hotel is empty, why would a hotel conglomerate start a new Franchise called Meet or Greet or something very similar? It's very nice though. Maybe it is to keep pace with the hip, new Moxy hotel competition from the Marriott. They are less empty, utilising our monthly account proposal as based on a minimum 6 month agreement. It uses to be 10 years. However, if the guest wants a single month at the monthly rate, we provide it. We recommend $833.33 per month that would work out to about $100,000.00 over 10 years. We say $800.00 per month for an easily marketable number. If the necessity of a hotel is really based on current need as it arises as based on location although all the buildings tend to be empty at the current rate regardless of location, then the industry says it is logical to find a way to earn more money on the current vacancies. The rate would demand adjustment to achieve the objective; thereby earning more for what is a business. The rate in the newspaper set at around $50.00 a night is just based on an attempt to achieve false esteem as if you are trying to set the price of your own worth. But, the building is empty. We can all work together to achieve success. We also see that most hotels are good looking buildings with attention getting architecture. But, they are empty at night. I think Jesus was born in the hotel or the INN and not in the manger. There was room in the INN. But, what is the point of a good looking building if there are no guests. You cannot force people to book at the rate you set and certainly there are so many hotels. The average rate is still about &$¥€ 100.00 currency. But, the average occupancy rate might be 5 people in that beautiful building. A woman might be a man"s first church or Christian ministry but you can not Force her to be your genuine friend. If she is not your genuine friend, what is the point? Would it be better to have 5 guests at £/&/¥€ 100.00 currency and only 500.00 currency earned a day or 50 guests a night at 40.00 currency a day? The price is soo mow and it affects my self esteem or maybe I should not attach my self-esteem to the room rate but to the earnings per week and at 40.00 currency a day, I earn more than at 100.00 currency a day where the building is really beautiful but empty. At 40.00 currency we expect at least 50 reservations a day at any location since it's a location based Industry and that will bring earnings to 2000.00 currency a day instead of 500.00 to 900.00 currency a day. There are televisions also and enough of them for private use where you can watch your Netflix. The entire idea is being proposed to Primark, McDonald's, Burger King and Starbucks with IBIS and a good hostel company. They, Primark, run large buildings betting on a profit on $10.00 shirts and $5.00 under wear. No earnings are guaranteed. The hostel/motel/hostel business is not going away where they hope to earn money offering lodging at $17.00 to $25.00 per night. Nothing is guaranteed but maybe the average hostel earned more money on 300 people at about $15.00 per night. That is more, $4500.00, than Holiday Inn earned last night where they only had 10 official guests at $125.00 per night or fewer guests at the average hotel. We see a niche market with travellers seeking lodging at $/£20.00 or less. 70 bookings a night per location at £/$15.00 is £/$1050.00 per night. The hostels will be revamped with a gym style shower room with lockers and benches like what is seen at the average public pool; at least one per building. The major hotels will now take safe rate walk- in guests and safe rate online bookings at $25-$30.00 per safe rate per night, per person who can stay from 9 pm to 8 am with an independent ensuite wash room since the fucking building is empty, almost totally, every night. So, why not increase revenue. The safe rate is not convenient and is designed as a last minute type of offer. It is only for a few hours and does not meet the average travelers needs as they would have to wait around until 9:00 pm, feeling a little sad. 70 bookings per night at £/$30.00 is £/$2100.00 per night at almost every location or across the chain with at least one location in every major town offering the rate. Most locations will not be busier but there will be more business across the entirety of the hotel chain. $2100.00 per night X 30 days is $/£63,000.00 per month. The problem is that many people in the industry who work at the front desk etc associate their own personal worth to the room rate charged per night and some say they will not feel successful unless the rate is $100.00 or more. The real issue is not what you book per night for one customer but how much you earn per night or per month. We need a Cuban to run the hotel industry. A "per month" rate is also still available in the Angel Ronan ™ proposal at $/£ 800.00 per month if you request it. Those who are anxious for self- valuation will focus competitively on the amount for the day rate. Those who think about competition for more business and will lower the posted rate accordingly to obtain more bookings. A vacation to Cuba is always a few hundred dollars less than a Jamaican vacation for the same sun, sea and tropical food in the Caribbean sea. Cuba is always nearly sold out. Jamaica has a number of hotel properties but they are nearly fully vacant. They estimate there will be 240 Extra bookings per night on the safe rate. We also now propose the opportunity for guests to text room service from their mobile device or email. About bookings, Some may have been booked on the side by the enterprising front desk clerk who will share half with the head office. He had 40 guests on his own book at $833.00 per month. He will send half to the head office. The world could still be sick about a Black Aboriginal introducing laws to Brownish Black Northern Aboriginals who became mixed as white with Northern Mongol DNA. The African Aboriginal is the first to pray and the first acknowledge the fallen tendencies in human kind. He is then also the first to study the human being and his unique nature, to practice burial and also medicine for healing. There skin was either brown or Black bur we just say African. They are saved from the obfuscating limitations in identity of the Black or Brown Aboriginal who is still not sure about Africa and he may not be African. Some of these originally brown Aboriginals are still as sick as Herod Antipas about law and laws about slap and tickle that must take place in the context of a commitment. I think it should. I don't want to see any more advertising that confirms Herod's Cheddar argument and confusion. The Catholic Church wins. Another facet of some building or hotel renovations will involve 5-10 floors of micro unit public housing that might utilise the 90, 150 to 400 Square foot apartment or hotel unit concept with full kitchen , washers, dryers, stoves and microwaves; with full bathrooms and bedding. The hostels will have a full public gym with showers and lockers, a restaurant and also a hostel with several dormitory rooms and some private rooms. The gym shower with lockers will be accessible for free to hostel guests. So, we have ideas like PRIONS ™( prayer in French) and now also Safe Sleepers ™ and I know Egyptian people and black people have ideas all day long that help. But, there is a brown, black and beige skinned essentially aboriginal people from the Western hemisphere who take old story books from Dickens and their black and white sketch images as an ancestral message from officialdom. They exclude themselves from involvement. They also exclude you too. They are creative with music and food and movies. Look at Spike Lee. Look at Sports teams and musicians. We have Black Lawyers also who win in Court like Warren A. Lyon and who hire white and black people. Warren worked for a few Jewish Lawyers and Black Lawyers who were also Jewish. Ideas are not authority or expressions of hegemony. Yet, there are those who are stuck ancestrally in some kind of resentment of the African or the Brown who arrive with ideas that are novel; arrive in Scotland or England or Europe generally as an Egyptian and then also as Romans or as Conquistadors in America. We cannot imagine they were all white. There are white people and black people, who are excited about black or brown people with ideas. They do not see it as a threat. There are brown or black people and some white people, however, who do see the Brown Egyptian person with ideas as a threat; a residual Neanderthal Aboriginal reaction to any help that the agent of civilization may bring. We would not call the resentment racism since both Black and white tend to have the same resentment of the Black idea guy. They would prefer to steal than to cooperate. They would kill instead of cooperate. Cooperation is emblemised in the pyramid. It could be normal in any context to see someone with ideas as threat when you are the eternal ship captain although a sail could be a great help or a motor also. You should not kill. But, if you are going to use the idea and the résumé and download the photos, when will you go to jail? Maybe get your own personality and take your own phone photos. Have some self respect. I'm only joking. Thanks for the acknowledgement dude. So, this problem in terms of resenting and hindering vs. cooperation might be called NeaNderthal Aboriginal-ism instead of racism when people regardless of colour are engaged in the problem. It might break down to a "day one" reaction between brown Egyptian Aboriginals intending to build stone henge as a civilizational marker and the originally brown Cheddar that might have been in a war over territory and maybe also kin. Sometimes these day one reactions remain as residue in the soul as you respond to the black guy who took this black Porsche photo or who designed the future Hostel that will get government sponsorship. He is happy to work with you; be a part of your team. Yet we are all mixed today with a little Scot Cheddar or Scandinavian Cheddar DNA in us and a little Genghis Khan Mongol. We are all a little African and a little Montezuman Aboriginal and a little Mediterranean. Molto Bene. Access to this Coffee shop area is free up to 12 am. You pay $5.00 afterwards and a coffee with a stick of bread is included. Buy more of the food and coffee as you wish. An airline style blanket and pillow is $5.00. Some old office buildings are being converted for the various shared purposes. The chairs recline like patio chairs or airline chairs and the guests can get a blanket. Rooms with bunk beds are also still available to bed four or more in a family. if you need a single bunk, take a pod. If you think of yourself as white, you are living in an Eskimo's skin tone with brown Cheddar DNA mixed with Mongol Eskimo. There are shared professional gym showers with lockers, wide spacious Toilets and sinks. There is also a Co working space and a Primark shop with laundry and dry cleaning facilities. Access to the gym showers alone is $10.00/£10.00. Access to rent a locker is $5.00. There are pod sleeping units also available for a maximum of 8 hours sleep. They will carry a $10.00 charge. There is a company called the Planet ™ owned by Volkswagen that has occupied a government owned building at St. Pancras/Kings Cross that used to be an old Travelodge and Evening Standard Newspaper headquarters. It is full of timeless late 1960's and early 1970's architectural confidence with hints of wood and raw cement, blended with custom made leather chairs. It is rumoured it's ground floor lounge will be open 24 hours a day now, offering coffees and teas. There are also micro units that are only 150 square feet with a cot bed, a locker and desk. These are $20.00)£20.00 per night. Access to shower room is included. These micro units do not have washrooms. But there is a key, shelves and hangers. The beds are plastic and the guests can spread their own sheets. Regular hotel rooms are also available in the building. There will be Prions ™ security cameras in all electric wall sockets and light sockets where the camera is much like a mobile phone camera and will provide extra security. Prions ™ is a home and business security system designed by Warren A. Lyon. There are also regular hotel rooms in the complex if converting the building will make it possible where some guests would like that facility with a TV, hair dryers and kettles. I went to Buckingham Palace yesterday and various ideas just dawned on me. As proposed by Angel Ronan Lex Scripta.

Audi Q2.

Volkswagen ID1

Peugeot.

The running shoe. There are soo many of them on the market with brands like Skechers or LA COSTE K Swiss sold all over the world so that the running shoe is really about personal taste and style. All the shoes promise superior comfort, performance and cushioning in various kinds of design and packaging that are set to attract one consumer or the other. But, some shoes are not designed for outside wear and you are not likely to know this before you purchase them. It could be an old design from the '70s that still carries tremendous fashion currency. There is a new shoe on the market called Veja® and it is very popular with people who enjoy low key, minimalist design cues. People who read the bible tend to wear them. In fact, there is an Anthropology of the running shoe and the wearer that is about to emerge. Watch this space for the upcoming article. The Veja® is most popular among those aspiring to fight for the rights of designers, music artists, photographers and directors so that they can enjoy their intellectual property on the internet without the unusual presumption that if it's marketed on the internet, it is free. NIKE K SWISS. ADIDAS

Samsung.

Pepsi.

Superdry ®.

Bugatti.

Tasha Cobbs Leonard.